https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188573 In a second appeal under Section 100 CPC, the High Court must first consider and record reasons on whether a substantial question of law arises; a non-speaking summary dismissal is improper. In a suit for specific performance, issues of readiness and willingness, the discretion to decree specific relief, and delay or laches are not invariably pure questions of fact and may directly affect substantive rights. Because the High Court did not examine that threshold issue with reasons, its order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration on whether a substantial question of law arose and, if so, for decision according to law. en-us Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Dec 2016 17:11:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188573 In a second appeal under Section 100 CPC, the High Court must first consider and record reasons on whether a substantial question of law arises; a non-speaking summary dismissal is improper. In a suit for specific performance, issues of readiness and willingness, the discretion to decree specific relief, and delay or laches are not invariably pure questions of fact and may directly affect substantive rights. Because the High Court did not examine that threshold issue with reasons, its order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration on whether a substantial question of law arose and, if so, for decision according to law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188573