<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 285 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335640</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appeals challenging Orders-in-Original on Service Tax demand for Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Services. The Tribunal considered precedents from the High Court of Bombay and the withdrawal of appeals by the Revenue, leading to the conclusion that the issue was no longer open for consideration. As a result, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any necessary consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2016 15:39:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 285 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335640</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appeals challenging Orders-in-Original on Service Tax demand for Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Services. The Tribunal considered precedents from the High Court of Bombay and the withdrawal of appeals by the Revenue, leading to the conclusion that the issue was no longer open for consideration. As a result, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any necessary consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>