<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1146 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188569</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with issues 1 and 2 decided in favor of the assessee regarding the exclusion of income from scrap sale and processing charges for deduction under section 80 IB. Issues 3 and 4 were remitted back to the AO for fresh adjudication concerning the disallowance of interest related to capital assets and the addition under Rule 8D for the assessment year. The Tribunal directed the AO to provide a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to present evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1146 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188569</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with issues 1 and 2 decided in favor of the assessee regarding the exclusion of income from scrap sale and processing charges for deduction under section 80 IB. Issues 3 and 4 were remitted back to the AO for fresh adjudication concerning the disallowance of interest related to capital assets and the addition under Rule 8D for the assessment year. The Tribunal directed the AO to provide a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to present evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>