<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1345 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188565</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, ruling that the denial of cenvat credit by the service tax department was incorrect. The appellant&#039;s registration was in effect before the ISD invoices were issued, meeting the requirements of Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The tribunal distinguished previous decisions cited by the respondent, ultimately setting aside the order denying cenvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1345 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188565</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, ruling that the denial of cenvat credit by the service tax department was incorrect. The appellant&#039;s registration was in effect before the ISD invoices were issued, meeting the requirements of Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The tribunal distinguished previous decisions cited by the respondent, ultimately setting aside the order denying cenvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>