<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 271 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding the appellants eligible for credit on the disputed input services related to authorized service station service, outdoor catering service, mandap keeper service, and convention service for the period from April 2007 to December 2011. The impugned order denying CENVAT Credit was set aside, granting consequential reliefs if any.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2016 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 271 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding the appellants eligible for credit on the disputed input services related to authorized service station service, outdoor catering service, mandap keeper service, and convention service for the period from April 2007 to December 2011. The impugned order denying CENVAT Credit was set aside, granting consequential reliefs if any.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>