https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335625 The Tribunal held that the appellant correctly availed Cenvat Credit despite initial denial based on non-registration as an input service distributor. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal found the denial of credit unjustified and set aside the order, allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs. The decision clarifies that denial of credit solely due to non-registration is not valid, highlighting the need to adhere to proper procedures for credit availing. en-us Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:29:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335625 The Tribunal held that the appellant correctly availed Cenvat Credit despite initial denial based on non-registration as an input service distributor. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal found the denial of credit unjustified and set aside the order, allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs. The decision clarifies that denial of credit solely due to non-registration is not valid, highlighting the need to adhere to proper procedures for credit availing. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335625