<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 265 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335620</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the order remanding a refund claim for re-examination by the original authority, emphasizing the obligation to address refund claims regardless of assessment challenges. Citing legal precedents, including Micromax Information Limited Vs UOI and Yu Televentures Private Limited Vs UOI, the tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal. The decision underscored the importance of following established legal principles and ensuring proper consideration of refund requests in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2016 10:06:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 265 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335620</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the order remanding a refund claim for re-examination by the original authority, emphasizing the obligation to address refund claims regardless of assessment challenges. Citing legal precedents, including Micromax Information Limited Vs UOI and Yu Televentures Private Limited Vs UOI, the tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal. The decision underscored the importance of following established legal principles and ensuring proper consideration of refund requests in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>