<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 261 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335616</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the decision not to impose penalties on two individuals in a customs duty case. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to drop penalties on the individuals due to insufficient evidence linking them to the customs duty evasion scheme. It emphasized the necessity of presenting substantial evidence to contest a lower authority&#039;s ruling in similar matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2016 10:06:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 261 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335616</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the decision not to impose penalties on two individuals in a customs duty case. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to drop penalties on the individuals due to insufficient evidence linking them to the customs duty evasion scheme. It emphasized the necessity of presenting substantial evidence to contest a lower authority&#039;s ruling in similar matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>