<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 786 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188562</link>
    <description>Central excise dispute before the Supreme Court ended with dismissal of the revenue appeal. The record does not set out any substantive reasoning, statutory interpretation, or legal principle beyond the operative order. The document therefore indicates only the final procedural outcome and does not disclose the basis on which the Court declined relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 18:46:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 786 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188562</link>
      <description>Central excise dispute before the Supreme Court ended with dismissal of the revenue appeal. The record does not set out any substantive reasoning, statutory interpretation, or legal principle beyond the operative order. The document therefore indicates only the final procedural outcome and does not disclose the basis on which the Court declined relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>