<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 374 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188559</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s order and restored the appellate authority&#039;s decision to remove the respondent from service. The respondent&#039;s reinstatement, if any, pursuant to the High Court&#039;s order, would not require repayment of salary and allowances for actual duty performed. The appeal was allowed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 374 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188559</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s order and restored the appellate authority&#039;s decision to remove the respondent from service. The respondent&#039;s reinstatement, if any, pursuant to the High Court&#039;s order, would not require repayment of salary and allowances for actual duty performed. The appeal was allowed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>