<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 9 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5982</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court granted leave in a case where the High Court&#039;s decision to decline a reference was set aside, and the case was referred back to the High Court for its opinion on the proposed questions raised by the Revenue regarding the correctness of the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel a penalty under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act for filing a return beyond the prescribed period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 9 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5982</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court granted leave in a case where the High Court&#039;s decision to decline a reference was set aside, and the case was referred back to the High Court for its opinion on the proposed questions raised by the Revenue regarding the correctness of the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel a penalty under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act for filing a return beyond the prescribed period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>