<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 305 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant for assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05, holding that the transactions involving the sale of shares were genuine based on the evidence provided, including purchase and sale documents, bank statements, and confirmation from the broker. The Tribunal rejected the department&#039;s appeals, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s comprehensive evidence supporting the authenticity of the transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 17:28:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 305 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant for assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05, holding that the transactions involving the sale of shares were genuine based on the evidence provided, including purchase and sale documents, bank statements, and confirmation from the broker. The Tribunal rejected the department&#039;s appeals, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s comprehensive evidence supporting the authenticity of the transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>