<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1206 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188555</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all the appeals of the assessee, holding that the purchase and sale of shares were genuine and the gains obtained should be taxed under the head &#039;capital gain.&#039; The Tribunal emphasized the lack of concrete evidence to disprove the transactions, stating the Revenue&#039;s case relied on suspicion and conjecture. The decision was pronounced on 24th September 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 17:28:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1206 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188555</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all the appeals of the assessee, holding that the purchase and sale of shares were genuine and the gains obtained should be taxed under the head &#039;capital gain.&#039; The Tribunal emphasized the lack of concrete evidence to disprove the transactions, stating the Revenue&#039;s case relied on suspicion and conjecture. The decision was pronounced on 24th September 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>