<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 249 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335604</link>
    <description>Permission was granted to withdraw the special leave petition with liberty to file a review application before the High Court, as the petitioner disputed factual findings recorded in the impugned judgment. The Supreme Court did not examine the merits of the controversy and disposed of the petition as withdrawn, preserving the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue review proceedings in the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 249 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335604</link>
      <description>Permission was granted to withdraw the special leave petition with liberty to file a review application before the High Court, as the petitioner disputed factual findings recorded in the impugned judgment. The Supreme Court did not examine the merits of the controversy and disposed of the petition as withdrawn, preserving the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue review proceedings in the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>