<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 248 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335603</link>
    <description>The Allahabad High Court dismissed the department&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of undisclosed income by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in a case involving a search and seizure operation. The Court emphasized that additions must be based on evidence found during the search, and material not discovered during the search cannot be used to determine undisclosed income. As the share transaction was disclosed in the regular tax return before the search and lacked concrete evidence of being bogus, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, highlighting the lack of legal merit in the department&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 14:53:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 248 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335603</link>
      <description>The Allahabad High Court dismissed the department&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of undisclosed income by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in a case involving a search and seizure operation. The Court emphasized that additions must be based on evidence found during the search, and material not discovered during the search cannot be used to determine undisclosed income. As the share transaction was disclosed in the regular tax return before the search and lacked concrete evidence of being bogus, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, highlighting the lack of legal merit in the department&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>