<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 243 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335598</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the penalty for concealment of income on the actual sale consideration but deleting the penalty on the difference due to the deeming fiction of Section 50C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 14:53:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 243 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335598</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the penalty for concealment of income on the actual sale consideration but deleting the penalty on the difference due to the deeming fiction of Section 50C.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>