<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 241 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the AO to delete additions made under Sections 68 and 69C. The AO lacked jurisdiction under Section 153A as no incriminating material was found during the search. The Tribunal ordered reassessment of the exemption issue under Section 54F, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing and consideration of relevant evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 241 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the AO to delete additions made under Sections 68 and 69C. The AO lacked jurisdiction under Section 153A as no incriminating material was found during the search. The Tribunal ordered reassessment of the exemption issue under Section 54F, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing and consideration of relevant evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>