<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (8) TMI 52 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188545</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment under section 34 of the Income-tax Act is valid only where the Income-tax Officer has objective material giving rise to a reason to believe that income has escaped assessment; mere suspicion, satisfaction, or rumour is insufficient. On the facts discussed, no additional material was shown to justify the reopening, so the point was treated as a question of law fit for reference. The further challenge to the addition of assessable income was also treated as a legal question because it turned on whether there was material evidence to support the further sum and whether the later action was merely a review of the original assessment on the same material. The Tribunal was directed to state the case and refer both questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 13:26:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (8) TMI 52 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188545</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment under section 34 of the Income-tax Act is valid only where the Income-tax Officer has objective material giving rise to a reason to believe that income has escaped assessment; mere suspicion, satisfaction, or rumour is insufficient. On the facts discussed, no additional material was shown to justify the reopening, so the point was treated as a question of law fit for reference. The further challenge to the addition of assessable income was also treated as a legal question because it turned on whether there was material evidence to support the further sum and whether the later action was merely a review of the original assessment on the same material. The Tribunal was directed to state the case and refer both questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>