<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 227 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335582</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the appellant, a service provider, successfully demonstrated that the service tax demand was unjustified due to a bank error in depositing the payment in the wrong account initially. The appellant rectified the error, providing evidence and a certificate confirming the correct payment. The court found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order confirming the tax demand and granting any necessary relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 12:37:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 227 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335582</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the appellant, a service provider, successfully demonstrated that the service tax demand was unjustified due to a bank error in depositing the payment in the wrong account initially. The appellant rectified the error, providing evidence and a certificate confirming the correct payment. The court found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order confirming the tax demand and granting any necessary relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>