<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 221 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335576</link>
    <description>The appeals challenging the rejection of refund claims for excise duties were allowed by the Tribunal. The lower authorities&#039; rejection was criticized for lack of proper verification and failure to consider documentary evidence provided by the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of diligent consideration of evidence and highlighted that the burden of excess duty payment not being contested should lead to refund sanctioning. The impugned orders were set aside, and the matters were remanded to the Original Authority for thorough verification of refund claims within a three-month deadline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 221 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335576</link>
      <description>The appeals challenging the rejection of refund claims for excise duties were allowed by the Tribunal. The lower authorities&#039; rejection was criticized for lack of proper verification and failure to consider documentary evidence provided by the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of diligent consideration of evidence and highlighted that the burden of excess duty payment not being contested should lead to refund sanctioning. The impugned orders were set aside, and the matters were remanded to the Original Authority for thorough verification of refund claims within a three-month deadline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>