<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 218 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335573</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai remanded capital goods credit cases related to cement and steel used for construction of foundation, directing fair hearings and appropriate orders in line with specific judgments such as Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur Vs Rajasthan Spinning &amp;amp; Weaving Mills Ltd. The Tribunal emphasized thorough review based on evidence and pleadings, setting a deadline for resolution by 30th September 2016 without imposing penalties. This decision aims to ensure clarity and fairness in adjudication, highlighting the importance of following legal precedents for just resolution of disputes concerning capital goods credit claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:49:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 218 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335573</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai remanded capital goods credit cases related to cement and steel used for construction of foundation, directing fair hearings and appropriate orders in line with specific judgments such as Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur Vs Rajasthan Spinning &amp;amp; Weaving Mills Ltd. The Tribunal emphasized thorough review based on evidence and pleadings, setting a deadline for resolution by 30th September 2016 without imposing penalties. This decision aims to ensure clarity and fairness in adjudication, highlighting the importance of following legal precedents for just resolution of disputes concerning capital goods credit claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>