<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 217 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335572</link>
    <description>Gold bar manufactured from Anode Slime/Dore Anode was considered eligible for exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE. The issue was treated as already settled in the assessee&#039;s favour by a prior Supreme Court decision on the same question, and the contrary appellate order could not be sustained. The exemption was therefore held admissible to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:48:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 217 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335572</link>
      <description>Gold bar manufactured from Anode Slime/Dore Anode was considered eligible for exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE. The issue was treated as already settled in the assessee&#039;s favour by a prior Supreme Court decision on the same question, and the contrary appellate order could not be sustained. The exemption was therefore held admissible to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>