<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 204 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335559</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order for recovery of a refunded interest amount, emphasizing the importance of judicial discipline and consistency in decisions. Another related appeal challenging a denial of refund was also allowed to prevent unnecessary litigation by the Revenue and maintain consistency in judgments. The Tribunal stressed the need for adherence to legal norms and fairness in refund claims and recovery actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 204 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335559</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order for recovery of a refunded interest amount, emphasizing the importance of judicial discipline and consistency in decisions. Another related appeal challenging a denial of refund was also allowed to prevent unnecessary litigation by the Revenue and maintain consistency in judgments. The Tribunal stressed the need for adherence to legal norms and fairness in refund claims and recovery actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>