https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335557 Confiscation of seized goods and penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 were set aside because the adjudicating authority had indicated that a comprehensive show cause notice covering the full investigation would follow, and a subsequent detailed notice was placed before CESTAT. In view of that later notice and the need for reconsideration on the full merits, the Tribunal held that the proper course was remand to the original authority. The matter was returned for fresh adjudication on merits, and the appellant was to be given a fair opportunity to defend the case. en-us Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335557 Confiscation of seized goods and penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 were set aside because the adjudicating authority had indicated that a comprehensive show cause notice covering the full investigation would follow, and a subsequent detailed notice was placed before CESTAT. In view of that later notice and the need for reconsideration on the full merits, the Tribunal held that the proper course was remand to the original authority. The matter was returned for fresh adjudication on merits, and the appellant was to be given a fair opportunity to defend the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335557