https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335556 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the registration of the head office as an input service distributor, emphasizing that registration status does not impact credit distribution. It also held that denial of credit distribution by the Revenue was unjustified, allowing the appellant to avail the credit. The judgment reaffirmed consistent application of cenvat credit principles and stressed the importance of verifying input services receipt and complying with Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Ultimately, the appellant's entitlement to credit distribution was upheld, overturning the Revenue's decision. en-us Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:47:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335556 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the registration of the head office as an input service distributor, emphasizing that registration status does not impact credit distribution. It also held that denial of credit distribution by the Revenue was unjustified, allowing the appellant to avail the credit. The judgment reaffirmed consistent application of cenvat credit principles and stressed the importance of verifying input services receipt and complying with Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Ultimately, the appellant's entitlement to credit distribution was upheld, overturning the Revenue's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335556