<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 200 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335555</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on M/s.G. Devasai International and Shri T.R. Bhoopalan under the Customs Act, 1962. However, it overturned the penalties on Shri M.Ritesh, considering his role as a middleman and the Settlement Commission&#039;s order allowing proceedings against co-noticees. The decision emphasized the need to evaluate individual culpability and the effects of Settlement Commission determinations on related parties in customs matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 200 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335555</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on M/s.G. Devasai International and Shri T.R. Bhoopalan under the Customs Act, 1962. However, it overturned the penalties on Shri M.Ritesh, considering his role as a middleman and the Settlement Commission&#039;s order allowing proceedings against co-noticees. The decision emphasized the need to evaluate individual culpability and the effects of Settlement Commission determinations on related parties in customs matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>