https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188532 The Supreme Court declined to entertain the appeal because the tax effect arising from the dispute was minimal. The appeal was therefore dismissed on that limited fiscal impact alone, and no further substantive reasoning or legal principle was stated in the order. en-us Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Dec 2016 09:47:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188532 The Supreme Court declined to entertain the appeal because the tax effect arising from the dispute was minimal. The appeal was therefore dismissed on that limited fiscal impact alone, and no further substantive reasoning or legal principle was stated in the order. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188532