<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1169 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188533</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court disposed of the Special Leave Petition without recording substantive reasons on the merits, and directed the High Court to decide the pending Special Criminal Application in the nature of habeas corpus on merits. The operative effect is that the writ petition remains to be adjudicated substantively by the High Court, rather than being left undecided or disposed of only because of the SLP proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 09:47:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1169 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188533</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court disposed of the Special Leave Petition without recording substantive reasons on the merits, and directed the High Court to decide the pending Special Criminal Application in the nature of habeas corpus on merits. The operative effect is that the writ petition remains to be adjudicated substantively by the High Court, rather than being left undecided or disposed of only because of the SLP proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>