<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1085 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188528</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee, overturning the disallowance of the expenditure claimed on repairs and maintenance of building, plant, and machinery. The Tribunal ruled that the expenses were revenue in nature, necessary for running the business, and not conferring enduring benefits. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to allow the claimed expenditure as revenue expenditure, leading to the deletion of the additions sustained/made by the Ld.CIT(A)/AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 09:47:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1085 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188528</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee, overturning the disallowance of the expenditure claimed on repairs and maintenance of building, plant, and machinery. The Tribunal ruled that the expenses were revenue in nature, necessary for running the business, and not conferring enduring benefits. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to allow the claimed expenditure as revenue expenditure, leading to the deletion of the additions sustained/made by the Ld.CIT(A)/AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>