<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (9) TMI 64 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188527</link>
    <description>Interest is ordinarily an integral part of mesne profits, and the normal court rate of 6 per cent should not be reduced without clear special circumstances. The Supreme Court stated that continued possession after removal from management remained wrongful, and prior managerial status or the size of the decree did not justify a lower rate. It also accepted the High Court&#039;s limited deduction for the value of improvements to the converted stable and elephant stand, and upheld the computation of profits and collection charges on the basis adopted in the joint working out of the decree. The only modification concerned restoration of interest at 6 per cent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 18:53:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (9) TMI 64 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188527</link>
      <description>Interest is ordinarily an integral part of mesne profits, and the normal court rate of 6 per cent should not be reduced without clear special circumstances. The Supreme Court stated that continued possession after removal from management remained wrongful, and prior managerial status or the size of the decree did not justify a lower rate. It also accepted the High Court&#039;s limited deduction for the value of improvements to the converted stable and elephant stand, and upheld the computation of profits and collection charges on the basis adopted in the joint working out of the decree. The only modification concerned restoration of interest at 6 per cent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>