https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188524 Mesne profits are ordinarily chargeable to the person in wrongful actual possession, and liability does not shift by mere pleadings of collusion; on the facts, the SC treated the third defendant as solely responsible and rejected any set-off of the plaintiff's price deposit against that liability. It further stated that the mesne profits period under Order XX Rule 12(1)(c) runs from the operative decree for possession and profits, excluding the Receiver period, and that 6 per cent interest was appropriate on the evidence. Interest on sums withdrawn and later redeposited was also recoverable in restitution under Section 144 CPC. en-us Wed, 07 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Dec 2016 18:44:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188524 Mesne profits are ordinarily chargeable to the person in wrongful actual possession, and liability does not shift by mere pleadings of collusion; on the facts, the SC treated the third defendant as solely responsible and rejected any set-off of the plaintiff's price deposit against that liability. It further stated that the mesne profits period under Order XX Rule 12(1)(c) runs from the operative decree for possession and profits, excluding the Receiver period, and that 6 per cent interest was appropriate on the evidence. Interest on sums withdrawn and later redeposited was also recoverable in restitution under Section 144 CPC. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188524