<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 541 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188520</link>
    <description>Imported goods were held entitled to release without payment of customs duty on the facts recorded in the earlier order. The Court also clarified that any reversal of Modvat credit, if required under excise law, would be made by NALCO subject to statutory remedies. Separately, the petitioner could apply to the customs authorities for a detention certificate, and any such application was to be disposed of expeditiously and in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 18:25:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 541 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188520</link>
      <description>Imported goods were held entitled to release without payment of customs duty on the facts recorded in the earlier order. The Court also clarified that any reversal of Modvat credit, if required under excise law, would be made by NALCO subject to statutory remedies. Separately, the petitioner could apply to the customs authorities for a detention certificate, and any such application was to be disposed of expeditiously and in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>