https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188519 The Bombay HC held that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal's interpretation of Rule 209A and Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules. The Tribunal's conclusions were founded on its reading of the rules and on the revenue's own stand, and the High Court found no legal basis to interfere with those findings. The appeal was therefore dismissed. en-us Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188519 The Bombay HC held that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal's interpretation of Rule 209A and Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules. The Tribunal's conclusions were founded on its reading of the rules and on the revenue's own stand, and the High Court found no legal basis to interfere with those findings. The appeal was therefore dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188519