https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188517 A decree passed by a court with jurisdiction is not rendered a nullity merely because limitation was wrongly decided; the error remains one for appeal and cannot be ignored later. The suit was treated as within limitation because it had been filed in time, the plaint was returned and re-presented in the proper court, and the period spent in bona fide prosecution in the wrong court was deductible. The assignment and sale transactions were found to be sham, unsupported by real consideration or effective transfer. The appellant also had no vested right to insist that the High Court appeal be heard by a larger Bench. en-us Tue, 15 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Dec 2016 17:24:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188517 A decree passed by a court with jurisdiction is not rendered a nullity merely because limitation was wrongly decided; the error remains one for appeal and cannot be ignored later. The suit was treated as within limitation because it had been filed in time, the plaint was returned and re-presented in the proper court, and the period spent in bona fide prosecution in the wrong court was deductible. The assignment and sale transactions were found to be sham, unsupported by real consideration or effective transfer. The appellant also had no vested right to insist that the High Court appeal be heard by a larger Bench. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188517