<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (11) TMI 140 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188511</link>
    <description>The Division Bench can dismiss a petition challenging the constitutional validity of a State law at the admission stage if it does not raise a substantial or arguable question. However, if an arguable point is raised, the petition must be referred to a Bench of five Judges for determination. This decision aligns with the interpretation of Article 228A of the Constitution, emphasizing the importance of addressing real and arguable constitutional questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (11) TMI 140 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188511</link>
      <description>The Division Bench can dismiss a petition challenging the constitutional validity of a State law at the admission stage if it does not raise a substantial or arguable question. However, if an arguable point is raised, the petition must be referred to a Bench of five Judges for determination. This decision aligns with the interpretation of Article 228A of the Constitution, emphasizing the importance of addressing real and arguable constitutional questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>