https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188504 A plaint filed on the Original Side of the Calcutta High Court after the amended procedural regime was held to require compliance with affidavit support and verification requirements, but the omission was procedural and did not invalidate institution at the outset. The defect was curable, did not affect jurisdiction, and could not render the suit non est. Once cured, the plaint was treated as instituted from the original date of presentation, as procedure was to facilitate, not defeat, substantive adjudication. en-us Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188504 A plaint filed on the Original Side of the Calcutta High Court after the amended procedural regime was held to require compliance with affidavit support and verification requirements, but the omission was procedural and did not invalidate institution at the outset. The defect was curable, did not affect jurisdiction, and could not render the suit non est. Once cured, the plaint was treated as instituted from the original date of presentation, as procedure was to facilitate, not defeat, substantive adjudication. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188504