<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (10) TMI 81 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188501</link>
    <description>Employees performing timekeeping, payroll, attendance, leave and related clerical duties in a factory fall within the definition of &quot;worker&quot; under the Factories Act, 1948 when those functions are incidental to or connected with the manufacturing process. The definition of &quot;worker&quot; and the concept of &quot;manufacturing process&quot; are broad, and the Act must receive liberal construction as welfare legislation to advance its object without straining the language. The omission of the word &quot;whatsoever&quot; from the earlier enactment did not materially narrow the statutory scope. On the factual findings, the employees&#039; duties were sufficiently connected with the workshop&#039;s running, so the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 11:48:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (10) TMI 81 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188501</link>
      <description>Employees performing timekeeping, payroll, attendance, leave and related clerical duties in a factory fall within the definition of &quot;worker&quot; under the Factories Act, 1948 when those functions are incidental to or connected with the manufacturing process. The definition of &quot;worker&quot; and the concept of &quot;manufacturing process&quot; are broad, and the Act must receive liberal construction as welfare legislation to advance its object without straining the language. The omission of the word &quot;whatsoever&quot; from the earlier enactment did not materially narrow the statutory scope. On the factual findings, the employees&#039; duties were sufficiently connected with the workshop&#039;s running, so the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>