<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1094 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188488</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s quantum appeal, upholding the additions related to bogus purchases and trading results. However, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was overturned, as the Tribunal found the assessee had provided necessary details, leading to the deletion of the penalty imposed for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 10:35:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1094 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188488</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s quantum appeal, upholding the additions related to bogus purchases and trading results. However, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was overturned, as the Tribunal found the assessee had provided necessary details, leading to the deletion of the penalty imposed for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>