<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335533</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and fully allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-appeal for statistical purposes. The case was remanded to the CIT(A) for reconsideration of the Section 14A disallowance, while upholding the treatment of advertisement film expenditure as revenue in nature. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 18th November 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335533</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and fully allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-appeal for statistical purposes. The case was remanded to the CIT(A) for reconsideration of the Section 14A disallowance, while upholding the treatment of advertisement film expenditure as revenue in nature. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 18th November 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>