<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 176 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335531</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the expenses in question were necessary for the business and directly related to the project sold in the preceding year. The Tribunal ordered the deletion of the additions made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals), allowing the appeal for the assessment year 2009-10.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 08:38:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 176 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335531</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the expenses in question were necessary for the business and directly related to the project sold in the preceding year. The Tribunal ordered the deletion of the additions made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals), allowing the appeal for the assessment year 2009-10.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>