<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 171 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335526</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of bad debts written off by an Industrial Investment Bank for the Assessment Year 2009-10, amounting to Rs. 51,95,96,000. The Tribunal found that allowing the deduction would result in a double benefit for the assessee as they had already claimed a deduction for provisions made in a previous year. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, and the lower authorities&#039; orders were upheld, justifying the disallowance to prevent a double deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 08:38:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 171 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335526</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of bad debts written off by an Industrial Investment Bank for the Assessment Year 2009-10, amounting to Rs. 51,95,96,000. The Tribunal found that allowing the deduction would result in a double benefit for the assessee as they had already claimed a deduction for provisions made in a previous year. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, and the lower authorities&#039; orders were upheld, justifying the disallowance to prevent a double deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>