<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 169 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335524</link>
    <description>The ITAT Pune upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to confirm the addition of unexplained gold jewellery and silver articles as income for Assessment Year 2012-13. Despite the assessee&#039;s explanations based on various sources, including wealth tax returns and CBDT Circular, the authorities found the evidence insufficient to prove the source of the items. The ITAT agreed that the assessee failed to substantiate the origin of the jewellery and silver articles seized during the search, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirming the additions made by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 08:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 169 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335524</link>
      <description>The ITAT Pune upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to confirm the addition of unexplained gold jewellery and silver articles as income for Assessment Year 2012-13. Despite the assessee&#039;s explanations based on various sources, including wealth tax returns and CBDT Circular, the authorities found the evidence insufficient to prove the source of the items. The ITAT agreed that the assessee failed to substantiate the origin of the jewellery and silver articles seized during the search, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirming the additions made by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>