https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335521 The judgment upheld the order dropping the service tax demands due to a time bar and set aside the demand for service tax on brokerage/incentive and share transfer agent fees for the period before 01/5/06. The decision emphasized the need for evidence to prove intentional evasion for invoking the extended period of limitation and clarified that service tax liability arises only from the date a service is included in the statute. en-us Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Dec 2016 08:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335521 The judgment upheld the order dropping the service tax demands due to a time bar and set aside the demand for service tax on brokerage/incentive and share transfer agent fees for the period before 01/5/06. The decision emphasized the need for evidence to prove intentional evasion for invoking the extended period of limitation and clarified that service tax liability arises only from the date a service is included in the statute. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335521