<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 160 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335515</link>
    <description>Valuation of packaged excisable goods under the Central Excise Act turns on whether the goods are sold directly to industrial or institutional consumers. Rule 2A of the Packaged Commodities Rules excludes such direct transactions from its scope, but that exclusion was not available here because the goods were not sold directly to any institutional or industrial consumer and were cleared only through dealers. The packages were covered by the Packaged Commodities Rules and did not carry a declaration that they were not meant for resale. On that factual basis, valuation under Section 4A applied and valuation under Section 4 was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 160 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335515</link>
      <description>Valuation of packaged excisable goods under the Central Excise Act turns on whether the goods are sold directly to industrial or institutional consumers. Rule 2A of the Packaged Commodities Rules excludes such direct transactions from its scope, but that exclusion was not available here because the goods were not sold directly to any institutional or industrial consumer and were cleared only through dealers. The packages were covered by the Packaged Commodities Rules and did not carry a declaration that they were not meant for resale. On that factual basis, valuation under Section 4A applied and valuation under Section 4 was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>