<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 159 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335514</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) order as legal. It emphasized compliance with duty payment regulations, reversing credits as required by law, and rejected the plea of revenue neutrality. The judgment highlighted the necessity of adhering to duty payment obligations and dismissed arguments invoking penalties and extended periods based on revenue neutrality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 08:18:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 159 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335514</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) order as legal. It emphasized compliance with duty payment regulations, reversing credits as required by law, and rejected the plea of revenue neutrality. The judgment highlighted the necessity of adhering to duty payment obligations and dismissed arguments invoking penalties and extended periods based on revenue neutrality.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>