<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 157 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335512</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellants correctly availed cenvat credit on customs duty paid challans for warehoused imported goods. The Tribunal found no diversion of goods, matching entries in registers, and no evidence of fake challans. Citing case laws, the Tribunal emphasized that when goods are received and used in manufacturing without dispute, cenvat credit cannot be denied. The decision was supported by legal provisions and factual findings, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that credit could only be based on bills of entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 08:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 157 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335512</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellants correctly availed cenvat credit on customs duty paid challans for warehoused imported goods. The Tribunal found no diversion of goods, matching entries in registers, and no evidence of fake challans. Citing case laws, the Tribunal emphasized that when goods are received and used in manufacturing without dispute, cenvat credit cannot be denied. The decision was supported by legal provisions and factual findings, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that credit could only be based on bills of entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>