<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 156 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335511</link>
    <description>Contemporaneous account evidence and buyer-wise corroboration established a pattern of routing sale proceeds through a separate account to conceal clearances and suppress turnover for small scale industry exemption, so clandestine removal and the unit&#039;s penalty were upheld. The director was found to have played a conscious role in the arrangement, but the penalty was reduced as excessive in the circumstances, so liability remained in principle with partial relief on quantum. The finance manager was treated as an employee without proof of a culpable role, so the penalty against him was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 08:18:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 156 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335511</link>
      <description>Contemporaneous account evidence and buyer-wise corroboration established a pattern of routing sale proceeds through a separate account to conceal clearances and suppress turnover for small scale industry exemption, so clandestine removal and the unit&#039;s penalty were upheld. The director was found to have played a conscious role in the arrangement, but the penalty was reduced as excessive in the circumstances, so liability remained in principle with partial relief on quantum. The finance manager was treated as an employee without proof of a culpable role, so the penalty against him was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>