<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 155 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335510</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner of Central Excise&#039;s decision to deny Cenvat credit to shock absorber manufacturers based on allegedly incomplete debit notes. Finding the notes contained all required details, including issuer, recipient, specific credits, and relevant invoice information, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants. Emphasizing that credit cannot be refused solely based on the form of credit transfer, the judgment highlighted the importance of meeting documentation requirements for credit availment. The decision set aside the denial of credit, affirming the appellants&#039; entitlement to the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 155 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335510</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner of Central Excise&#039;s decision to deny Cenvat credit to shock absorber manufacturers based on allegedly incomplete debit notes. Finding the notes contained all required details, including issuer, recipient, specific credits, and relevant invoice information, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants. Emphasizing that credit cannot be refused solely based on the form of credit transfer, the judgment highlighted the importance of meeting documentation requirements for credit availment. The decision set aside the denial of credit, affirming the appellants&#039; entitlement to the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>