https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335505 The Tribunal upheld the decision that the respondent must maintain separate accounts for inputs used in manufacturing dutiable and exempted goods. The respondent was allowed to avail cenvat credit on inputs used in dutiable final products but not on exempted finished goods. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, emphasizing the necessity of complying with the Cenvat Credit Rules to avoid disputes over cenvat credit. en-us Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Apr 2017 13:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335505 The Tribunal upheld the decision that the respondent must maintain separate accounts for inputs used in manufacturing dutiable and exempted goods. The respondent was allowed to avail cenvat credit on inputs used in dutiable final products but not on exempted finished goods. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, emphasizing the necessity of complying with the Cenvat Credit Rules to avoid disputes over cenvat credit. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335505