<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 145 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335500</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant to avail CENVAT credit on duty paid items used for manufacturing purposes, citing legal precedents and evidence presented. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs, as the subject items were deemed to fall under the definition of capital goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 08:13:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 145 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335500</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant to avail CENVAT credit on duty paid items used for manufacturing purposes, citing legal precedents and evidence presented. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs, as the subject items were deemed to fall under the definition of capital goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>